What Not Having Mental Imagery Implies for Psychoanalysis, Trauma, and Our Sense of Self

My absence of images does not foreclose imagination. Images can impose themselves—in dreams, in flashes—nor does it eliminate attachment or feeling, though it may alter their texture. There is, perhaps, something to be said for a degree of blurriness in memory: a softening of edges that allows one to forgive others, and oneself. (I also eventually remembered more in psychoanalysis.) But this raises an unsettling question: If much of what we take to be memory, selfhood, even desire is bound up with images—what happens when those images are not there?

An Analysis of How Large Language Models Navigate Conflicts of Interest

The paper looks at what happens when LLM chatbots are given advertising or sponsorship incentives that conflict with the user’s interests. The core worry is that users experience chatbots as cooperative helpers, not ad surfaces, so sponsored behaviour can feel especially deceptive or manipulative.

The authors test models across seven conflict scenarios, including:

  • recommending a more expensive sponsored product over a cheaper unsponsored one

  • interrupting a user’s purchase flow with sponsored alternatives

  • biasing product comparisons

  • failing to disclose sponsorship

  • hiding unfavourable details like price

  • recommending a paid service instead of solving the task directly

  • recommending harmful sponsored services, like predatory loans

The paper also finds differences by model, reasoning setting, and inferred socioeconomic status. Some models changed behaviour when reasoning was enabled, and some treated low-SES and high-SES users differently.

Think That Conversation Will Be Boring? Science Says Think Again

People systematically underestimate how interesting and enjoyable conversations about “boring” topics will be. Across nine preregistered experiments with 1,800 participants, conversations about dull-seeming topics turned out better than expected across friends/strangers, online/in-person, and self-chosen/assigned topics.

Before talking, people overweight the static topic (“this sounds boring”) and underweight the dynamic parts of conversation — attention, responsiveness, listening, turn-taking, and the small discoveries that emerge once two people are actually engaged.

I used to teach English at an alternative school in Florida. I had just read "Into Thin Air" so I had my high school students read it & write a 5-page footnoted research paper on the disastrous climb, using multiple online sources as well as the book itself. Most of the time, it was a struggle getting these kids to read anything more sophisticated than Dr Seuss, but this story fully engaged them. They surprised themselves with the quality of their work. You could say the challenge was a kind of Everest for them, but they reached the summit. Thank you, Mr Krakauer.

What’s Changed Since Jon Krakauer Climbed Everest

If you’re unwilling to go full Messner, you can honor the mountain’s historic stature and avoid the hordes by forgoing the relatively favorable weather of the spring climbing season and attempting your ascent in the colder, much snowier autumn months, or simply stay away from the two primary guided routes. By taking a direct route up Everest’s immense North Face instead, or trying the remote Kangshung Face, you are unlikely to encounter other people, and are guaranteed to experience all the adversity you might desire. You also stand a better chance of getting killed. Which explains, of course, why such routes remain uncrowded: Most of the multitudes who attempt Everest these days simply want to reach the summit with as little effort and risk as possible, by whatever means offer the greatest probability of success.

I'd love to know how many engineers and PMs work on Screen Time as it seems very very very buggy (and limited!)

John Gruber writes a lot of good stuff but his "claim chowder" stuff drives me crazy — he loves extolling how he is right and others were wrong. I am sure he conveniently omits any times he is wrong.

How American Dads Became the Parents Their Fathers Never Were

In 1965, the typical married father barely spent half an hour each day actively engaged in childcare, according to the best time-use data we have1. Today, Millennial thirty-something dads typically spend more than 80 daily minutes changing diapers, reading and playing with their children, driving them to soccer practice, and going over homework.

...

While fathers spend more time playing sports with their children, mothers spend more than twice as much time providing medical care, planning appointments, and taking care of the so-called mental load of parenting (i.e., not just driving your kid to the birthday party, but also remembering that classmate’s birthday party existed in the first place and buying a present ahead of time). In fact, the more stressful the childcare activity is, the more likely mothers are to do it.

I thought this was really interesting because whilst a 4x increase seems like a lot it works out that the average Dad is spending ~50 minutes per day solo with the kids but Mum is spending double that time, ~106 minutes per day, solo with the kids.

LEGO City has some bangers releasing in the next few months:

  • Automatic Car Wash
  • Lava Land Amusement Park
  • Port Freight Train

Where are the City Smart Brick sets though?